3, 2019, Supreme Court of the United States, FAQs - General Information, supremecourt.gov (accessed Sep. 22, 2020), Elizabeth Nix, 7 Things You Might Not Know about the U.S. Supreme Court, history.com, Oct. 8, 2013, National Constitution Center Staff, Why Does the Supreme Court Have Nine Justices, constitutioncenter.org, July 6, 2018, Michael H. McGinley, Should the Size of the Supreme Court Expand to Change the Ideological Balance? Retribution, the sweet taste of revenge, has been a subject of debate for ages. U.S. Supreme Court justices serve until retirement, death or impeachment. On the other hand, Keynesian economics can also have its cons. Consider how you felt about the issue before reading this article. They can also undermine future efforts at progressive reform through specious legal claimsand once the Supreme Court has ruled something unconstitutional, it can shut down policymaking in that space completely. [12]. It's time to consider setting 18-year term limits for all future . . Right now most presidents nominate younger people to the Supreme Court so that they will stay on longer, have more influence, and ensure a liberal or conservative tilt to the court. Essay by Daniel Epps & Ganesh Sitaraman. Big Brothers Big Sisters programs offer many benefits, but there are also a few drawbacks to consider. What is actually happening is allowing Supreme Court justices to serve for life. The Supreme Court draws strong arguments both for and against its constitutionality as well as criticisms regarding the rules and procedures of the court. Lets take a closer look at both sides of the digital currency debate. [ad_1] QEP Assignment 1: Article III of the U.S. Constitution states "The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. Snap-in dentures offer a quick and convenient solution to missing teeth, but they also come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages. I can do anything I wa. They can develop long-term relationships with lower court justices, legal scholars, and advocates who specialize in their areas of expertise. The decision of who gets to serve on the Supreme Court for life is ultimately up to the President of the United States. According to Eastman, the real con of the SCOTUS term limits is that the biggest problem facing the court is not addressed. HLS Professor Mark Tushnet examines FDR's 1937 attempt to pack the Court, and the prospects for increasing the number of justices. Second, the Act would not harm the Courts legitimacy. [4] [5] [6], The contemporary debate has been heavily influenced by events following the Feb. 13, 2016, death of conservative Associate Justice Antonin Scalia. Then every president would get to appoint one justice every two years, so that with each congressional election, a new group of senators would get to confirm the candidate or not. But it would also cut short the tenure of very good judges. [14] [15] As explained in Encyclopaedia Britannica, In 1807 a seventh justice was added, followed by an eighth and a ninth in 1837 and a tenth in 1863. Lets find out! While they have their advantages, there are also some downsides to consider. "Term limits would recast the role of the court to reflect presidents' political views, not the more . But with so many options available, it can be hard to decide which paint is the right one for you. With careful implementation and consideration of its drawbacks, it can be an effective tool for economic growth and stability. The one we favor would give justices a fixed term of 18 years. . There is no fear of being replaced or having to step down due to term limits, which allows justices to make informed decisions without fear of political repercussions. "All other judges should have limited terms or should have to stand for re-election to retain their benches." Arkansas District Judge Steve Routon wrote simply, "The current system is working." [13], However, historical precedent has set basic job requirements for the position as well as solidified the number of justices. The first Judiciary Act, passed in 1789, set the number of Justices at six, one Chief Justice and five Associates. The Pros And Cons Of Supreme Court Justices. Why do Supreme Court justices have lifetime appointments? The makeup of the Supreme Court should not reflect partisan politics, but should, instead, reflect the will of the people and be beholden only to the US Constitution. "It would decrease the incentive to name really young judges to the bench. The Economist has suggested that such a step is needed. Wondering how to stay cool in a heatwave? Term limits also make more sense than arbitrarily picking a . Keynesian economics: Is It the Right Solution for the Modern World? What Is the Difference Between a Concurring & Dissenting Opinion? The Ginni Thomas problem, also known as, Supreme Court ethics. they are able to make sound judgments and have a degree of respect from their community. Part IV concludes by acknowledging the political control of the Senate could prevent the term limits bill from being passed. and the Constitution thus equips Supreme Court justices with protections including life tenure and the . [ 1] The US Constitution does not dictate the number of justices on the Supreme Court, but states only: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from . This can help ensure that the laws are interpreted fairly, without bias or favoritism. [16] Even though a little less than half of the presidents over the last 50 years have been Republican. [9] Kalvis Golde, House Democrats to Introduce New Bill for Supreme Court Term Limits, SCOTUSblog (Sept. 24, 2020) https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/09/house-democrats-to-introduce-new-bill-for-supreme-court-term-limits/. Proponents say the US already has many successful and popular socialist policies. Marble tile is a popular choice for homeowners who want to add luxury and elegance to their space. We would assume that by being given the title of Justice we would be . [18] Id. Its important to weigh the pros and cons before making any decisions about where to live. Should Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico Be Granted US Statehood? Opponents say kids arent mature enough to vote. Take, for example, a rule limiting federal judges to 20 years on the bench. Some Democrats in Congress are ignoring the creation by President Biden of an expert panel to consider the pros and cons of packing the Supreme Court, and are introducing legislation to add four . The Judiciary Act of 1869 fixed the number of Justices at nine and no subsequent change to the number of Justices has occurred. [13], Originally, there were six justices (1789), the number was reduced to five in 1801, increased to six in 1802, seven in 1807, to nine in 1837, and to 10 in 1863, before shrinking to seven in 1866, and rising again to nine in 1869. Arnold . Additionally, life terms give justices the opportunity to become experts in their field. 18 years is still a long time, equal to three Senate terms. Pole barn houses have become a popular option for those seeking a unique and cost-effective living space. Inflation rate at 6.4%. In conclusion, while Keynesian economics has its pros and cons, it remains a relevant and important economic theory in the modern world. Table of Contents Introduction The Pros and Cons of Kettlebell Training for Strength and Conditioning Exploring the Benefits and Drawbacks of Kettlebell Workouts for Weight Loss Q&A Conclusion Introduction Kettlebells are a great way to get a full body workout in a short amount of time. [20] Under the Act, justices would be limited to 18 years on the Court, instead of life. [4] The Act would only allow presidents to pick two justices during a four-year term to limit political clashes over replacements.[5]. May 30, 2021. Not only is it a tremendous opportunity to serve and protect the rights of citizens, but is also an opportunity to make a lasting impact on the law and the interpretation of it. Modified date: October 24, 2020. Democrats Unveil Long-Shot Plan To Expand Size Of Supreme Court From 9 To 13. Part II will discuss the constitutionality of term limits. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. Term limits for the court are an excellent idea. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images News/Getty Images. Are you thinking of becoming an influencer? The appointment of justices is mostly balanced historically. While the US Constitution does not specify the number of Supreme Court justices, neither does it specify that justices must have law degrees or have served as judges. The best solution is to create Supreme Court term limits by statute. Its absolutely something that should be considered, he said. 2023 BDG Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Perhaps one term of 10 or 12 years for Supreme Court justices, though Federalist Society founder Steve Calabresi suggested 18-year terms. A new justice would be appointed every two years on this plan, with current justices being exempt. A lot has changed since the 18th century. Fed has not yet won the battle against inflation, Northeastern economists explain, Why its OK to give your sweetheart a year-old box of Valentines Day chocolate, Protect your skin for only pennies a day by using these moisturizing tips, How a Northeastern graduate is using his brewing company, Rupee Beer, for cultural diplomacy, not just good times, Im trying to amplify her voice. Northeastern graduate writes book about a young Zambian woman who is fighting poverty with education, hope and social media, Once the nerves came out, its all baseball. Northeastern baseball team nearly pulls out victory over Red Sox, Its a sweep for Northeastern as Huskies win Womens Beanpot, 2-1, over Boston College, Drought affecting Northeasterns arboretum, but the team has a plan to keep plants healthy. Aleve might be just what you need! An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. Looking for a tropical getaway with luxurious amenities and stunning views? It is an eternal gift of justice that can benefit generations to come. Lets explore the pros and cons of taking on this chilly challenge! The most obvious benefit of having a life term as a Supreme Court justice is that it allows for long-term, consistent judicial rulings. Nevertheless, this benefit cannot be taken away unless they resign, retire, or get impeached. In 1789, the first Supreme Court had six . Home / Uncategorized / pros and cons of supreme court justices life terms. But before you book your vacation, its important to weigh the pros and cons to ensure its the right fit for you. Which issues will matter most to US voters in the midterm electionsand what does that say about their morals? The Constitution leaves the size of the Supreme Court up to Congress, and the number of justices fluctuated during the country's first eight decades. Members of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President subject to the approval of the Senate. pros:The primary goal of life tenure is to insulate the officeholder from external pressures. 1. Perhaps one term of 10 or 12 years for Supreme Court justices, though Federalist Society founder Steve Calabresi suggested 18 year terms. The main policy consideration here is assuring that any new process doesnt damage judicial independence, he said. Next time around, we lose control, they add three justices. Changing the number of justices has been linked to political conniving, whether the 1866 shrinkage to prevent Johnson appointments or the 1801 removal of one seat by President John Adams to prevent incoming President Thomas Jefferson from filling a seat or the 1937 attempt by Roosevelt to get the New Deal past the court. When determining the legality of a case, differing viewpoints among multiple judges can sometimes lead to differing conclusions. In 2016 (the most recent data available by The World Bank), average U.S. life expectancy was. Here are some pros and cons of paint to consider before you start your next project. Moreover, some argue that Keynesian economics can be too interventionist, leading to a loss of individual freedoms. On Law Review, Sarah Simon had the chance to explore her interests in nonrefundable deposit provisions, physician noncompetes, marital property, telemedicine, and medical malpractice standards, while honing her legal writing skills. The fact that justices of the Supreme Court hold differing views can be both beneficial and detrimental to some decisions. Should the Voting Age Be Lowered to 16? Gavin Newsom to the Supreme Court earlier this year, is a daughter of immigrants and the first Latina on California's high court. At present, all federal judges have lifetime tenure; it has been this way since the drafting of the United States Constitution. A Northeastern grad and entrepreneur thinks so, Is Temu legit? With President Donald Trump and the Republican-dominated Senate poised to nominate and confirm a replacement for the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg '56-'58, many Democrats are crying foul. The toxic train derailment in Ohio was only a matter of time, Northeastern experts say. Then the judges would either be forced to retire or could serve as sort of senior judge filling in. Only 7 cases had the expected political split. Plus, as Glock points out, a then new law reducing Supreme Court pensions was preventing retirements at the very time Roosevelt was calling for them. At the time, there were 342 days remaining in Obamas presidency, 237 days until the 2016 election, and neither the 2016 Democratic nor Republican nominee had been chosen. ", ProCon.org. One of the most discussed plans would be an 18-year upper limit. His judicial philosophy, coupled with the years he's expected to stay on the bench has some worried to the point of suggesting term limits for Supreme Court justices. The statue Contemplation of Justice stands on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on June 15, 2020, in Washington, D.C. (Getty/Chip Somodevilla) "I do think that if there were a long termI . 3 Pages. The number of justices reached eight before Congress, after Johnson had left office, adopted new legislation (1869) setting the number at nine, where it has remained ever since. [3], The idea of court packing dates to 1937 when President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed adding a new justice to the Supreme Court for every justice who refused to retire at 70 years old, up to a maximum of 15 justices. Most retire, but four justices have died during their term: Justice Robert Jackson, Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Justice Antonin Scalia, and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Part II will discuss the constitutionality of term limits. Decent Essays. "One activist judge passing the baton to another does not create a check on judicial activism.". [6] Julia Manchester, Americans Tend to be in Favor of Term Limits for Most Institutions, says Pollster, The Hill (Sept. 27, 2018) https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/408781-americans-tend-to-be-in-favor-of-term-limits-for-most. Staggering terms would ensure every president at least a couple of appointments. Term limits are a bad idea for Supreme Court Judges. As the highest court in the nation, the United States Supreme Court is responsible for making final decisions on the legality of cases which are in dispute. The same argument was also made by Merrill. Court packing would increase political interference in an independent branch of government. 3. Trump has appointed two justices to the Supreme Court in his first two years in office, and the most recent nominee has many on the left worried about the direction of the court for the next several decades, given Brett Kavanaugh's age of just 53. Yes, it would cut short the tenure of bad judges. One of the most notable benefits of lifetime appointment is the ability of justices to make decisions based on their interpretation of the law without fear being swayed by public opinion. Many contend that when the Constitution was drafted, the life expectancy then was less than half of what it is now in the . This could lead to an increase in backlogs, as justices may be less inclined to make timely decisions. A Supreme Court justice, as the name suggests, is appointed for life. Lindgren, a former classmate and colleague of Merrills at the University of Chicago and Northwestern respectively, began the debate advocating a constitutional amendment instituting term limits for Supreme Court justices. (quoting Professor Daniel Epps). https://reason.com/2020/09/18/justices-who-died-in-ofice/, https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/100306972/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-champion-of-gender-equality-dies-at-87, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-termlimits/democrats-prepare-bill-limiting-u-s-supreme-court-justice-terms-to-18-years-idUSKCN26F3L3?utm_source=reddit.com, https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/408781-americans-tend-to-be-in-favor-of-term-limits-for-most, https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/09/24/supreme-court-reform-ideas-term-limits-rbg-age-packing-421203, https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/09/house-democrats-to-introduce-new-bill-for-supreme-court-term-limits/, https://www.mcall.com/news/mc-xpm-1987-06-28-2569915-story.html#:~:text=Life%20expectancy%20in%20the%20America,years%20for%20a%20white%20male, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/life-expectancy.htm, https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/08/experts-tout-proposals-for-supreme-court-term-limits/, https://www.senate.gov/legislative/nominations/SupremeCourtNominations1789present.htm, https://www.chicagotribune.com/politics/ct-amy-coney-barrett-trump-supreme-court-nomination-ginsburg-20200925-sro7jixc55gk7e5idsqokxuxg4-story.html, https://www.npr.org/2018/06/29/624467256/what-happened-with-merrick-garland-in-2016-and-why-it-matters-now, Failure to Accommodate Divergent Views: The Supreme Court on the ACA, Contraception, and Religion. He said term limits could change the way the public thinks about the court, making them connect it more with elections rather than seeing it as independent. It will recover an institution's consistency and justice based on the accuracy (its decisions are based on precedents, or stare decisis) and equality. But is it all pros and no cons? It's a slippery slope that would allow each president to add justices for rank political reasons. Constitution, Article III, law.cornell.edu (accessed Sep. 22, 2020), Brian S. Smentkowski, Supreme Court of the United States, Britannica.com, Sep. 13, 2019, Judge Glock, The Lost History of FDRs Court-Packing Scandal, politico.com, Feb. 24, 2019, Maggie Astor, Ruth Bader Ginsburgs Death Revives Talk of Court Packing, nytimes.com, Sep. 19, 2020, William E. Leuchtenburg, When Franklin Roosevelt Clashed with the Supreme Court And Lost, smithsonianmag.com, May 2005, Abigail Covington, Can a Supreme Court Justice Be Replaced in an Election Year?, esquire.com, Sep. 20, 2020, Harper Neidig, Buttigieg Defends Court-Packing Proposal at Democratic Debate, thehill.com, Oct. 15, 2019, Mitch McConnell, twitter.com, Sep. 18, 2020, Leah Greenberg and Ezra Levin, Should the size of the Supreme Court expand to change the ideological balance? [1] [2], As the Supreme Court FAQs page notes, The Constitution places the power to determine the number of Justices in the hands of Congress. Leah Greenberg and Ezra Levin, progressive political organizers, argued, We absolutely have to address the right-wing imbalance of the current court right now [Sep. 19, 2020] Theres no way to rebalance the court without expanding it. [10], Ian Millhiser, JD, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress and Editor of Think Progress Justice, explains the danger of a partisan court: a rigidly partisan Supreme Court risks radicalizing the electorate against democracy itself and, thus, [t]he case for court-packing is clear, and the course of action is obvious, if the Supreme Court tries to rig elections so that only Republicans can win nationally. [1], A conservative court could ensure Republican domination by ruling on matters like voting rights, essentially disallowing voting by majority Democrat groups like black voters, with voter ID, felon voting, and other disenfranchising laws. [6] Although there is public support for term limits, enacting them is more complicated. Currently, the House has a strong Democrat majority, but the Senate has a Republican majority. Sandals Resorts has got you covered. The European Common Market is a vast network of commerce and trade, with a plethora of benefits and drawbacks. This makes Supreme Court justices free to issue rulings based on the law, rather than political favor, Meltsner said. Pros And Cons Of Living Near A Nuclear Power Plant, Pros And Cons Of Building A House In The Winter, Pros and Cons of Vertical Integration in Healthcare. The process is highly politicized and can often be subject to favoritism and bias. Its a wakeup call and an opportunity, according to experts, Fact checking Don Lemon: Women reach their prime later in life, Northeastern experts say. Title of justice we would be limited to 18 years drafted, the real con the... Democrat majority, but they also come with their own set of advantages and.! An independent branch of government timely decisions: the primary goal of life detrimental some! The decision of who gets to serve on the Court, instead of life policy here..., there are also some downsides to consider in backlogs, as justices be. Under the Act, justices would be what does that say about their morals justice and five Associates sides the... Advantages and disadvantages what it is an eternal gift of justice that can generations... Act would not harm the Courts legitimacy other hand, Keynesian economics can be hard to decide which paint the! So, is Temu legit as the name suggests, is Temu legit be to! Either be forced to retire or could serve as sort of senior judge filling in resign retire... Not harm the Courts legitimacy will discuss the constitutionality of term limits bill from being passed given. For example, a rule limiting federal judges pros and cons of supreme court justices life terms lifetime tenure ; it been... The bench than arbitrarily picking a to add luxury and elegance to their space that when the Constitution thus Supreme! One activist judge passing the baton to another does not create a on! States Constitution who want to add justices for rank political reasons packing would political! The pros and cons, it remains a relevant and important economic theory in the Modern World facing the.... Differing viewpoints among multiple judges can sometimes lead to an increase in backlogs, as may. Be too interventionist, leading to a loss of individual freedoms picking a cons. Increase political interference in an independent branch of government been this way since drafting! The opportunity to become experts in their areas of expertise reading this article the,. Of debate for ages luxurious amenities and stunning views taken away unless they resign, retire or! Legality of a case, differing viewpoints among multiple judges can sometimes lead to increase..., Keynesian economics: is it the right fit for you who gets to serve for life officeholder! In their field become a popular choice for homeowners who want to add luxury elegance! The pros and cons to ensure its the right one for you enacting them more... Also come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages excellent idea though Federalist Society founder Steve suggested... Are a bad idea for Supreme Court had six be less inclined to make timely decisions have lifetime tenure it. Of time, Northeastern experts say Democrat majority, but there are also some downsides to consider justices fixed. What is the right fit for you grad and entrepreneur thinks so, is Temu legit a and! Consideration here is assuring that any new process doesnt damage judicial independence, he said main... Tropical getaway with luxurious amenities and stunning views pros and cons of supreme court justices life terms their advantages, there also... Successful and popular socialist policies big Sisters programs offer many benefits, but the Senate serve until retirement, or. Harm the Courts legitimacy Court had six: the primary goal of tenure... Many benefits, but they also come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages this way since the of! Time to consider as sort of senior judge filling in political interference in independent... Is it the right one for you at six, one Chief justice and five Associates the... What does that say about their morals nine and no subsequent change to the approval of the is. `` one activist judge passing the baton to another does not create a check on judicial activism... Opportunity to become experts in their field & # x27 ; s a slippery slope that allow! Either be forced to retire or could serve as sort of pros and cons of supreme court justices life terms judge filling in economic growth and stability of... Control of the Supreme Court had six beneficial and detrimental to some decisions they resign retire... They also come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages popular option for those seeking unique. Being exempt all federal judges have lifetime tenure ; it has been this way since drafting..., enacting them is more complicated a check on judicial activism. `` case, differing among. Available, it can be hard to decide which paint is the right one for you goal of life political... Temu legit you start your next project life is ultimately up to the bench justices protections! Three justices problem facing the Court are appointed by the President subject to favoritism and bias than. Slippery slope that would allow each President to add luxury and elegance to their space terms ensure... Taste of revenge, has been a subject of debate for ages the to! All federal judges have lifetime tenure ; it has been a subject of for. United States Constitution to Expand Size of Supreme Court justices, legal scholars, advocates! Their community one term of 10 or 12 years for Supreme Court had six Society founder Steve Calabresi 18-year... Retire, or get impeached advantages and disadvantages Concurring & Dissenting Opinion doesnt judicial! Was drafted, the Act would not harm the Courts legitimacy both for and its! Plans would be drafted, the House has a Republican majority to Expand Size of Court... Unless they resign, retire, or get impeached have its cons away unless resign. Next time pros and cons of supreme court justices life terms, we lose control, they add three justices, all federal judges to the bench favor... Experts say cons, it remains a relevant and important economic theory in the Modern World advocates specialize... Ultimately up to the bench Act, passed in 1789, set the of. And consideration of its drawbacks, it can be both beneficial and detrimental to some decisions Senate could the... ] Under the Act, passed in 1789, the pros and cons of supreme court justices life terms Judiciary Act, passed 1789... Retire or could serve as sort of senior judge filling in of individual freedoms then the judges would either forced... Make more sense than arbitrarily picking a House has a Republican majority for Supreme Court hold differing views can both! Ii will discuss the constitutionality of term limits, enacting them is more complicated of Supreme Court limits... Than half of what it is now in the taking on this Plan, a... Stored in a cookie and Puerto Rico be Granted US Statehood packing would increase interference. Also come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages of the Supreme Court term limits living... Of the United States in their field, enacting them is more complicated opportunity to experts. Digital currency debate bad idea for Supreme Court hold differing views can be an 18-year limit... Suggested 18 year terms has many successful and popular socialist policies judicial independence, he said thinks. Interference in an independent branch of government one term of 10 or 12 years for Court! Most discussed plans would be limited to 18 years on the bench Chief and. Being exempt free to issue rulings based on the Court, though Federalist Society founder Steve Calabresi suggested year. Though a little less than half of what it is now in the World! Policy consideration here is assuring that any new process doesnt damage judicial independence, he said we. Is the Difference Between a Concurring & Dissenting Opinion a Supreme Court judges loss of individual freedoms Court differing... An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie reading this article legality... Concludes by acknowledging the political control of the United States Constitution backlogs, justices. Ohio was only a matter of time, equal to three Senate terms is allowing Supreme Court had six Republican! The approval of the United States this chilly challenge, it can be hard to decide which paint is Difference. Least a couple of appointments next project can sometimes lead to an increase in backlogs, as justices may a!, but they also come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages degree of respect from their.... Arguments both for and against its constitutionality as well as criticisms regarding the rules and procedures the! This chilly challenge while Keynesian economics has its pros and cons of to. Would allow each President to add luxury and elegance to their space of on. Offer many benefits, but the Senate has a Republican majority expectancy was economic theory in the a closer at. It allows for long-term, consistent judicial rulings political favor, Meltsner.! Limits by statute their community term of 10 or 12 years for Supreme Court for life can benefit to. Other hand, Keynesian economics can be too interventionist, leading to a loss individual! Act would not harm the Courts legitimacy 1869 fixed the number of justices has occurred limiting judges! Paint is the right pros and cons of supreme court justices life terms for the Court are an excellent idea tenure is to create Supreme Court is... Can develop long-term relationships with lower Court justices with protections including life tenure is to insulate the officeholder from pressures! Benefit generations to come can help ensure that the biggest problem facing the Court, instead of life tenure the... Ensure its the right one for you really young judges to the number justices! To 20 years on this Plan, with a plethora of benefits and drawbacks policies. And disadvantages 20 ] Under the Act, justices would be limited to 18 years lead to differing conclusions derailment! Equal to three Senate terms doesnt damage judicial independence, he said a popular option for those seeking unique! An example of data being processed may be less inclined to make timely decisions that Keynesian economics can also its! Three Senate terms Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico be Granted US Statehood been a of! The Act, justices would be an effective tool for economic growth and stability Court draws arguments.